Monday, July 18, 2016

Shop Floor Inspection – Simple Solutions That Add Value


A few months ago we covered the topic of moving your CMM inspection to the shop floor, and some of the things to consider when doing so.

How will you monitor performance? 
How will the workflow be affected? 
Are there any limitations in space or environment? 

These are only a few of the items to be considered when planning a project of this nature, so now let’s dig a little deeper.


Anytime you are reshaping your plant floor, the first consideration is typically floor space. How much room do I have, and how best to use it? One strategy to make this planning process simple with a CMM is to put the machine in an enclosure.

A close fitting enclosure provides a stable environment for your machine, while also giving you a simple footprint to work with on your floor that has nearly the same footprint as the CMM itself. This makes planning floor space straightforward and easy while also providing some other benefits.

The manufacturing floor is a busy place and safety of people and equipment is always a priority. Therefore, placing your CMM in an enclosure provides protection for both your machine, and your staff, ensuring that you can maximize your up time and protect the longevity of your investment. 

In many instances, shop floor CMMs are introduced in areas where staff may not be well trained in working on or around such equipment. A simple enclosure can provide a layer of safety in this instance which ensures that your people and equipment can work at maximum productivity, giving you the best ROI on your investment.

Over time, the environment of your shop floor can change significantly. You may have seasonal changes in temperature and humidity, or even changes to the ambient levels of dust, coolant, and debris. These changes are not always accounted for when purchasing equipment, and can often affect the performance on your CMM. An enclosure can help you eliminate the effects these changes have on your system and ensure consistent output, performance, and accuracy now, and for years to come.

The single biggest benefit to a CMM enclosure, is the fact that it can allow you to re-purpose a tool you may already own. Let’s say you want to build a new cell on the floor, with a CMM to handle inspection. Looking for a new “Shop Floor CMM” may add a level of cost that makes the project unrealistic for you. 

But what if you could simply take your existing CMM, and move it to the shop floor? This would avoid the cost and lead time of buying new capital and help you realize the ROI of the cell even faster. 

Simple, right? So what’s the catch? Many times when designing a CMM enclosure, people can over complicate things; building in automated controls, complicated power solutions, and levels of environmental controls beyond what you would do if you were putting the machine in your Inspection Room. 

This can lead to the perception that CMM Enclosures are expensive and a big hassle, when in reality it may simply mean you are working with a vendor that doesn’t have a good solution for you. After all, the enclosure only needs to do two things: 

  1. Provide a barrier between the machine and the shop floor environment
  2. Help you measure your parts with ease and confidence.

Any feature of the enclosure that doesn’t advance these two points is adding unnecessary cost and complexity, and should be avoided.  A CMM enclosure can be a simple, cost effective solution to help you realize the benefits of shop floor inspection. 

It can help you plan an effective workflow, protect your investment, and help you avoid buying specialized equipment that may not scale with your needs over time. 

At Wenzel America, we pride ourselves on our ability to help you make the best choices for your business when it comes to inspection. 



So next time you are planning a new work cell, avoid the maze of specialized solutions and let us help you find a simple, cost effective inspection solution that will support you for years to come.


Thursday, July 14, 2016

Measuring Round Parts



Sometimes if you're searching for Wenzel, you may run into a picture like the one below. Especially during the summer, people are more likely to think about tents than measuring round parts. I, however, can't stop thinking about round parts!




There are many different strategies for measuring round parts. From basic touch trigger CMM’s, entry level roundness or form checkers, to scanning CMM’s, and all the way to dedicated high-end roundness checkers. Instead of just focusing on form, many times these parts have dimensional features that need to be checked. Ideally, one machine could measure everything.

Examples of round parts encompasses a wide variety such as, shafts, cylinders, and housings. These are just a few varieties of the round part family and they have different GD&T callouts as compared to prismatic parts.

Consider Runout - (Resource - GD&T Basics











Runout is how much one given reference feature or features vary with respect to another datum when the part is rotated 360° around the datum axis. It is essentially a control of a circular feature, and how much variation it has with the rotational axis. Runout can be called out on any feature that is rotated about an axis. It is essentially how much “wobble” occurs in the one part feature when referenced to another.


Gears present a challenging metrology task in that they are rotational parts and that they have a feature, teeth, that need to be checked with their own unique considerations.

For example, looking at a transmission, you can see a number of parts that are clearly in this family. Additionally, when you think of transmissions, you naturally think of gears.

So checking gears could be considered near the pinnacle of challenging parts to measure. They encompass all the rotational characteristics that are important, as well as the unique feature of teeth that need to be checked.

While all gears do not have tolerances that are tight, we can safely say that the tolerances for gears going into automotive transmissions need to be fairly high tolerance because of the immediate feedback the end user experiences, noise, feedback and performance.

So checking gears, instantly rules out all roundness checkers because they cannot measure teeth. It rules out a touch trigger CMM, because not enough data is collected for the roundness measurements. It leaves scanning CMM’s and dedicated gear checkers. 

Enter the Wenzel WGT Family of instruments

What if you could have a instrument that could check all the rotational features that are called out on your part as well as some dimensional features?

Features such as, Diameter, Distance, Axial and radial run-out, Perpendicularity and parallelism, Roundness, Flatness and straightness, Accumulated run-out (axial and radial), Position, Concentricity and coaxiality, Symmetry, Cylindricity, Run-out of interrupted contours. 


What is interesting about these characteristics is on a traditional roundness checker it cannot measure a simple diameter out of the box. While a roundness checker can give you very accurate results on all of the roundness characteristics, adding the capability to measure diameter usually entails a special engineered solution or a huge jump in price. These instruments are not built as multi-purpose measuring tools, rather they are for the most part dedicated to a specific task.


A WGT is built from the ground up with our knowledge on how to make 3-axis coordinate measuring machines. What does this mean to you? It can handle ALL the measurements your round parts require + it can measure gears.

The WGT family uses a scanning probehead to take hundreds, if not thousands of points. So you get all the advantages of CMM scanning. With a simple add-on it can also measure surface roughness, as well being able to detect grinding burn. 

Another important consideration is the rotary table capacity. In some CMM solutions, it is an afterthought. At Wenzel we realize that it is integral to measuring these types of parts. The capacity of the two types of rotary table are: the pneumatic goes up to 3,000kg, diamter of 750mm, the hydrostatic up to 30,000kg, diameter of 1800mm.

Gears + 

To summarize, a WGT is not just for measuring gears, it provides answers to multiple metrology questions.



Also, if you need to measure something, slightly larger, and it's round, we have answers for that too. Search for Wenzel America or the Wenzel Group and find pictures like those below, instead of tents. 








Wednesday, July 13, 2016

Benchmarking Company Performance

In business why wouldn’t you measure your performance against your peers and against relevant industry sector data?

Last month we talked about customer satisfaction surveying and the Net Promotor Score; this month we are looking more specifically at the health of manufacturing sector in the US and the orders obtained for manufacturing technology (largely metal cutting machine tools).

At Wenzel we watch the PMI (Purchasing Managers Index) and the USMTO (United States Manufacturing Technology Orders) numbers and compare them with our own performance.

The Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) is an indicator of the economic health of the manufacturing sector. The PMI is based on five major indicators: new orders, inventory levels, production, supplier deliveries and the employment environment. These current indicators are analyzed but somehow it gives us a view into the future, through the eyes of purchasing managers, as to how confident they are about ordering equipment because of the growth they foresee.
An index of 50 represents a stagnant market, anything above 50 a growing sector
and anything below 50 a contracting sector.

USMTO is managed by AMT, The Association For Manufacturing Technology. Members of the USMTO provide order acquisition data each month and this information is then compiled into a report showing the orders placed in 5 different regions of the USA. This data normally takes a process time of 2 months so unlike the PMI index, the USMTO data is looking back into recent history a little more.

I believe that both measures above give an excellent snapshot as to the health of the manufacturing sector in the US, one being slightly more forward looking and the other slightly more retrospective. Having said this if we plot both measures on top of one another we can see a very high degree of correlation, which would give me some confidence that both measures are tracking the same thing and with a high degree of agreement about the state of the US manufacturing economy.

Comparison of USMTO and PMI data over the last 5 years.



So what do these measures tell us about the state of manufacturing or perhaps more precisely manufacturing investment (even more significant for vendors!)?

USMTO order for May 2016 were 18.2% down on May 2015 and April and May’s orders were the lowest for 5 years
There has been a slow downward trend in orders since the ‘boom’ of 2010
PMI in June was 53.2 – an average for the last 5 years, but a great deal healthier than in Q4 2015 and January 2016 where the index was below 50 for 4 months running.

So not good news on the whole.

The upcoming IMTS show in Chicago should help stimulate new business. See the USMTO national figures plotted below and look at the peaks of September 2012 and 2014. These peaks coincide with the IMTS show and experts at AMT see no reason why IMTS will not have the same stimulus this year.


Also click below to listen to Pat McGibbon, VP of Strategic Analytics of AMT, talking about the May orders report. The folks at AMT (USMTO) believe that the decline is slowing and by the time IMTS comes around we will see some growth and a strong finish to the year.




All of the five regions are down this year when compared to a 4 year average.


  • The NE region is down in real numbers but its share of US consumption has increased from 17% to 20%. 
  • The SE has seen a 15% decline in 2016 but its share has also increased from 10 to 12%.
  • The West region has declined the least (just 6.5%) and has increased its share from 15% to 18% this year.
  • The North Central (The mid-west rust belt!) is split into two, east and west, but together they account for 45% of the US machine tool consumption. This percentage has held in 2016 but orders are down around 15% compared to the 4 year average.
  • The region hit most hard, presumably due to the oil price affecting investment in Texas is the South Central region. Orders in 2016 are less than a third of the 4 year average and its percentage share has dropped from 12 to 6% of total consumption.

So, in summary all regions are down with some worse than others.

As Pat pointed out in the AMT video some industries are still doing well. So for us vendors it makes sense to focus on the industries that are doing well like Aerospace, medical, guns and general engineering. It’s also good to note that others which have recently been hit hard show signs of improvement such as agricultural machinery.

So here’s my summary of what going on in the manufacturing sector and how it is affecting manufacturing technology or machine tool sales;


  • Following the boom of 2011, orders have consistently fallen to a level around 23% lower than 2011’s peak consumption.
  • AMT are forecasting and improvement and double digit sales growth in Q4 of 2016 and 2017.
  • IMTS we hope will have its normal positive effect
  • The recent jump in PMI tends to support this optimism in the AMT/USMTO forecast
  • We are hopefully at the bottom of the slump right now – things can only get better!